Iran Blocks the Strait of Hormuz: Why Fuel Prices Are Exploding and How 3D Bin Packing Saves Your Shipping Budget

Rate this post
$126
BRENT CRUDE PEAK PER BARREL
20%
GLOBAL OIL SUPPLY DISRUPTED
$7,000+ SURCHARGES ADDED PER CONTAINER40%
MAX ACHIEVABLE SHIPPING SAVINGS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. The Strait of Hormuz: Why 33 Kilometers Can Shake the World
  2. How Iran Closed the World’s Most Critical Energy Chokepoint
  3. The Fuel Price Explosion: Data from Leading Institutions
  4. The E-Commerce Shipping Cost Cascade
  5. The Surcharge Breakdown: What Merchants Are Paying Right Now
  6. Why Packaging Optimization Is Your Most Powerful Defense
  7. Dimensional Weight: The Silent Cost Multiplier
  8. How 3DBinPacking.com Slashes Your Shipping Budget
  9. The Fuel Surcharge Multiplier Effect
  10. Your 6-Step Shipping Resilience Action Plan
  11. Scenario Outlook: Oil Prices and E-Commerce Cost Projections
  12. Conclusion: Control What You Can

On February 28, 2026, a coordinated campaign of US and Israeli airstrikes ignited the most significant energy crisis in living memory. Iran retaliated not with a symbolic gesture, but with a move that sent shockwaves through every oil market, freight desk, and e-commerce fulfillment center on earth: the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

In the weeks that followed, Brent crude surpassed $126 per barrel, marine insurance premiums tripled overnight, and major carriers including Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd suspended all Middle East routes. A 40-foot container that cost $2,200 to ship in January now carries $4,000 to $7,000 in surcharges alone. Every link in the e-commerce supply chain — from ocean freight to last-mile delivery vans, from warehouse electricity to the foam insert inside a shipping box — is indexed to oil. When oil explodes, shipping costs follow.

This article is a data-driven briefing for e-commerce operators who need to understand what is happening, why it matters to their bottom line, and — most importantly — what they can do right now to recover margin. The answer begins with one of the most underutilized cost levers available: smart packaging and 3D bin packing optimization.

1. The Strait of Hormuz: Why 33 Kilometers Can Shake the World

The Strait of Hormuz is a narrow passage connecting the Persian Gulf — the world’s most prolific oil and gas producing region — to the Gulf of Oman and the open ocean. At its narrowest, the navigable channel is approximately 33 kilometers wide. Despite its modest geography, its economic significance is extraordinary.

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), approximately 20.9 million barrels of crude oil and petroleum products transited the strait daily in 2025. That figure represents roughly one-fifth of total global oil consumption and approximately 25–27% of all seaborne oil trade worldwide. The strait also carries nearly 20% of global liquefied natural gas (LNG) trade, virtually all of it originating from Qatar and the UAE.

Strait of Hormuz: Key Transit Data 2025 | Sources: IEA Oil Market Report, EIA World Oil Transit Chokepoints, Speed Commerce (March 2026)

CommodityDaily Volume% of Global Trade
Crude oil and condensate~15 million b/d~18% of global consumption
Refined petroleum products~5.5 million b/dSignificant share of diesel/jet fuel
Total oil and products~20.9 million b/d25–27% of seaborne oil trade
Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG)~80 million tons/year~20% of global LNG trade
Container trade (Gulf ports)~33 million TEU/year3.5% of global container trade

Iran occupies the northern bank of the strait, giving it unique leverage over this critical corridor. While Saudi Arabia and the UAE have limited pipeline bypass capacity (estimated at 3–5 million b/d combined against 20+ million b/d of normal flows), there is no viable maritime bypass route. Most shipping companies have rerouted around the Cape of Good Hope — adding 10–14 days and significant fuel costs to every voyage.

The Strait of Hormuz is no longer merely a narrow sea passage between Iran and Oman. With the outbreak of the latest Gulf war, it has become the most critical choke point in the global economy.

— Hellenic Shipping News, March 2026

2. How Iran Closed the World’s Most Critical Energy Chokepoint

On February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched coordinated airstrikes under Operation Epic Fury, targeting Iranian military facilities, nuclear sites, and senior leadership. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was killed in the strikes. Iran retaliated within hours with missile and drone attacks across US military bases and Gulf state infrastructure.

On March 4, 2026, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz to vessels linked to the United States, Israel, and their allies. The IRGC’s Khatam al-Anbiya Headquarters declared any such vessel “a legitimate target.” Tanker traffic collapsed immediately.

TIMELINE OF THE CLOSURE — KEY EVENTS
– Feb 28, 2026: US-Israeli Operation Epic Fury launches. Iranian Supreme Leader killed in strikes.
– Mar 1: Tanker transits fall from 24/day average to just 4 — three of them Iranian-flagged (Vortexa data).
– Mar 3: IRGC declares the strait “closed.” Major carriers Maersk and Hapag-Lloyd suspend Middle East routes.
– Mar 4: QatarEnergy declares force majeure on all LNG exports after attacks on Ras Laffan facilities.
– Mar 8: Brent crude crosses $100/barrel for the first time in four years (Wikipedia, 2026 Strait of Hormuz Crisis).
– Mar 11: IEA releases 400 million barrels from emergency reserves. Iran warns of $200/barrel oil.
– Mar 12: Gulf producers collectively cut output by at least 10 million b/d as storage fills up.
– Mar 19: US Armed Forces begin military campaign to reopen the strait.
– Late Mar: Iran selectively allows passage to Chinese, Russian, Indian and Pakistani vessels only.

As of late March 2026, more than 150 ships remain anchored outside the strait. Traffic has dropped by approximately 70% from pre-crisis levels. The International Energy Agency described the disruption as the “greatest global energy security challenge in history” — surpassing the 1973 oil embargo and 1979 Iranian Revolution in terms of absolute supply removed from global markets.

3. The Fuel Price Explosion: Data from Leading Institutions

The price response to the Hormuz closure has been rapid, severe, and documented by some of the world’s most authoritative financial and energy institutions. Below is a summary of key price data sourced from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, Goldman Sachs Research, Euronews, and the European Commission.

Energy price movements since Hormuz closure | Sources: Dallas Fed, Goldman Sachs, Euronews, Wikipedia (March 2026)

MarketPre-Crisis LevelPost-Crisis PeakChange
Brent Crude Oil~$73/barrel$126/barrel+73%
WTI Crude Oil~$69/barrel~$115/barrel+67%
Dutch TTF Natural Gas~31.6 EUR/MWh60+ EUR/MWh+90%+
German petrol (Super 95)1.82 EUR/litre2.07 EUR/litre+13.7%
Austrian petrol (Super 95)1.51 EUR/litre1.71 EUR/litre+13.2%
LNG tanker daily freight ratesBaselineBaseline +40%++40%+ (single day)

What Leading Institutions Forecast

The Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, in a March 20 research note, modeled three duration scenarios for the closure and their projected impact on WTI oil prices and global GDP growth:

Dallas Fed oil price and GDP scenarios by closure duration | Source: dallasfed.org, March 20, 2026

Closure DurationWTI Peak ($/barrel)Global GDP Impact (annualized)
1 quarter — reopens Q3 2026$98−2.9 pp in Q2 2026
2 quarters — reopens Q4 2026$115Negative through year-end
3 quarters — reopens Q1 2027$132−1.3 pp full-year 2026

Goldman Sachs Research adds a further upside risk scenario: if LNG flows remain halted for more than two months, European TTF natural gas could exceed 100 EUR/MWh — more than three times pre-crisis levels. Iran’s IRGC has publicly threatened $200/barrel oil if military pressure continues. Think tank Transport and Environment estimates European drivers are collectively paying an extra €150 million per day at current oil price levels.

4. The E-Commerce Shipping Cost Cascade

For e-commerce businesses, the Hormuz crisis is not a distant geopolitical event. It is a direct cost shock that is already arriving on shipping invoices. The connection is structural: every component of e-commerce fulfillment is petroleum-dependent.

HOW OIL PRICES FLOW INTO EVERY LINE OF YOUR SHIPPING INVOICE
Ocean freight bunker fuel: large container ships consume 100–350 metric tons of fuel oil per day. Bunker fuel (heavy fuel oil) prices track crude closely. Higher crude = higher bunker = higher base freight rates.
Carrier fuel surcharges (BAF/FAF): Bunker Adjustment Factor and Fuel Adjustment Factor surcharges are recalculated weekly or monthly. At $126/barrel crude, these surcharges have spiked well above pre-crisis norms.
War risk surcharges: Hapag-Lloyd added $1,500/TEU, CMA CGM $2,000–$4,000/container, Maersk $1,800–$3,800. These are stacked on top of BAF/FAF.
Marine insurance premiums: Pre-crisis: 0.125–0.25% of hull value per transit. Post-crisis: 0.5–1%+ (Mizuho Bank analysis). Overall marine insurance costs up 300%+ (Nventory.io, March 2026).
– Last-mile delivery surcharges: Domestic carriers (FedEx, UPS, DPD, DHL, InPost) adjust fuel surcharges monthly or weekly against diesel indices. At current oil prices, these adjustments move sharply upward.
Packaging material costs: Polybags, foam inserts, stretch wrap, and adhesives are petrochemical derivatives. Raw material costs rise 4–8 weeks after crude spikes.

According to CNBC’s analysis (March 11, 2026), shipping reroutes via the Cape of Good Hope extend delivery times by 10–14 days and raise per-shipment costs by 5–20% through passed-through surcharges. The disruption creates downstream port congestion, empty container shortages, and drayage bottlenecks — costs that compound over the following 2–5 weeks as diverted vessels arrive in synchronized clusters at destination ports.

The initial ocean impact may take 10–14 days to appear, but the real pressure typically hits within 2–5 weeks as diverted containers arrive in clusters, terminal congestion rises, and drayage demand outpaces truck and chassis availability.

— Craig Geskey, VP Strategic Solutions, Traffix (CNBC, March 11, 2026)

5. The Surcharge Breakdown: What Merchants Are Paying Right Now

To quantify the scale of the current cost shock, logistics intelligence platform Nventory.io published a detailed breakdown of container shipping costs before and after the Hormuz closure. The numbers illustrate how quickly costs stack for importers sourcing from Asia:

40-foot container, Asia → US/Europe, January vs. March 2026 | Source: Nventory.io, March 2026

Cost ComponentJanuary 2026March 2026Change
Base ocean freight rate (40ft FCL)~$2,200~$3,800–$5,000+73–127%
Hapag-Lloyd war risk surcharge$0$1,500 per TEUNew charge
CMA CGM emergency surcharge$0$2,000–$4,000New charge
Maersk emergency freight increase$0$1,800–$3,800New charge
Marine insurance premium0.25% hull value0.5–1%+ hull value+300%
Total surcharges on a 40ft container$0$4,000–$7,000+From zero
THE STACKING MATH
A single 40-foot container from Asia that cost $2,200 to ship in January 2026 now costs $6,200 to $12,000+ all-in. For a merchant moving 60 containers per month, that is an annualized cost increase of $2.9 to $7.1 million. The surcharges are non-negotiable and applied across all major carriers simultaneously.

For smaller merchants shipping domestically or regionally within the US or Europe, the primary impact arrives through last-mile fuel surcharge adjustments and elevated packaging material costs. According to e-commerce packaging analysis from Anchor Box (December 2025), businesses shipping 10,000 packages monthly were already losing $3,000–$5,000 annually to inefficient packaging before the crisis — a figure that compounds sharply once fuel surcharges are calculated against dimensional (DIM) weight.

6. Why Packaging Optimization Is Your Most Powerful Defense

E-commerce operators cannot influence OPEC policy, geopolitical strategy, or carrier pricing committees. But they can — with significant financial impact — control the physical size and weight of every package they ship. In a high-fuel-cost environment, that control is worth more than at any previous point in e-commerce history.

The mechanism is direct. Modern parcel and freight carriers do not charge purely on actual weight. They charge on whichever is greater: actual weight or dimensional (DIM) weight — a calculated figure derived from a package’s volumetric measurements. When surcharges are applied as a percentage of billable weight, every cubic centimeter of wasted air inside a shipping box generates extra cost.

Research published in MDPI’s AI Systems journal (July 2025) identified over-packaging, suboptimal box-sizing, and poor product-to-logistics alignment as the three largest sources of avoidable cost in e-commerce fulfillment. The study confirmed that AI-driven packaging optimization reduces both material costs and DIM weight premiums simultaneously — a dual savings mechanism that is especially potent when fuel surcharges are elevated.

Analysis by Anchor Box (December 2025) quantified the opportunity: right-sizing boxes alone can reduce shipping costs by 15–20% annually while simultaneously reducing packaging material waste by 26–40%. At March 2026 surcharge levels, the effective per-parcel saving is higher than at any point in the preceding decade.

7. Dimensional Weight: The Silent Cost Multiplier

To understand why packaging optimization is such a financially significant lever right now, it is worth examining exactly how dimensional weight pricing works — and how the current surcharge environment amplifies its impact.

HOW DIMENSIONAL WEIGHT PRICING WORKS: A CONCRETE EXAMPLE
You ship a 1.4 kg consumer electronics accessory in a box measuring 42 cm x 32 cm x 22 cm.
DIM weight (divisor 5,000): 42 × 32 × 22 ÷ 5,000 = 5.93 kg
Billable weight: 5.93 kg (DIM) vs. 1.4 kg (actual) → carrier charges for 5.93 kg
Overpayment factor: You pay as if the package weighs 4.2× its actual weight.
At a fuel surcharge of $0.18/kg, that’s an extra $0.81 per parcel — on every single shipment.

This scales rapidly. A merchant shipping 15,000 parcels per month with an average DIM weight overage of 2.2 kg, at a carrier rate of $0.14/kg, is paying $4,620 per month — $55,440 per year — in entirely preventable DIM weight charges. At current fuel surcharge levels (which add a percentage multiplier to the billable weight charge), the real monthly cost of that inefficiency is even higher.

The mathematical complexity of the bin packing problem — formally classified as NP-hard, meaning there is no known algorithm that finds the perfect solution in polynomial time — is exactly why dedicated algorithmic tools so dramatically outperform manual packing. For 50 items, the number of possible arrangements exceeds the number of atoms in the observable universe. Human packers operating without algorithmic guidance make systematic suboptimal choices. Purpose-built 3D bin packing software eliminates that gap.

Dimensional weight pricing fundamentally changed how I approach packing optimization. Carriers charge based on package size rather than just weight, making space efficiency directly tied to shipping costs.

— Tom Mulawka, COO, 3DBinPacking.com (Smart Web Minds Ltd.)

8. How 3DBinPacking.com Slashes Your Shipping Budget

3DBinPacking.com is a cloud-based load optimization platform used by warehouses, e-commerce brands, manufacturers, and 3PL operators globally. The platform’s algorithms — including skyline-based 3D bin packing, mixed integer programming (MIP) models, and hybrid optimization approaches — solve the real-world challenge of selecting the most cost-efficient container for any given order in milliseconds.

Documented client outcomes from 3DBinPacking implementations

OutcomeMeasured ResultData Source
Reduction in shipping costs15%3DBinPacking client testimonials
Increase in packing throughput+19% packages per day3DBinPacking client testimonials
Container utilization improvement62% → 89%3DBinPacking retailer case study
Shipping cost reduction (pharma)Up to 40%Venus Remedies case study
Reduction in damage claims−23% to −58%Electronics & retail case studies
Space utilization (skyline algorithm)94% of capacityConsumer goods manufacturer
Reduction in packaging complaints−67%OMS integration case study

The Two Core E-Commerce Algorithms

The platform’s two most-used algorithms in e-commerce fulfillment are ‘Try Out Box Sizes’ and ‘Pack a Shipment.’ The first evaluates a merchant’s entire box inventory against a specific order and identifies the optimal container — the one that fits all items with minimum void space and lowest resulting DIM weight charge. The second determines the minimum number of packages needed to ship a multi-item order, selecting from available container options to minimize both packaging costs and total billable weight.

Both algorithms return results in milliseconds. Both include full 3D visual packing instructions for warehouse staff — color-coded, step-by-step guidance that eliminates the dependence on individual packer experience and delivers consistent, optimized results regardless of who is on shift.

API Integration: Seamless at Scale

The platform’s RESTful API integrates directly with existing e-commerce infrastructure — OMS, WMS, and ERP systems — enabling automatic packaging optimization for every order as it is placed. This creates several downstream benefits: accurate shipping cost estimation before checkout completion, elimination of post-fulfillment invoice surprises, and the ability to detect billing errors on carrier invoices (which the platform’s audit functionality flags automatically).

One retailer that integrated 3DBinPacking with its OMS reported a 67% reduction in customer complaints about inappropriate packaging within the first quarter of implementation. Before implementation, obtaining an accurate shipping quote for an unusual item combination required approximately one full business day. After integration, the same information is returned in under three seconds.

9. The Fuel Surcharge Multiplier Effect

There is a compounding dynamic at work in the current environment that makes packaging optimization more valuable than it has ever been: fuel surcharges and war risk surcharges are calculated as a percentage of billable weight. This means that every kilogram of wasted dimensional weight carries not just the base rate overage — it carries a proportional share of every stacked surcharge on top.

THE MULTIPLIER: ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE AT CURRENT SURCHARGE LEVELS
Merchant ships 40,000 parcels/month. Average DIM weight overage: 2.0 kg per parcel.
Base rate DIM overage cost: 2.0 kg × 40,000 × $0.13 = $10,400/month
Fuel surcharge portion on overage (~18% of billable weight charge): ~$1,872/month additional
War risk / emergency surcharge portion (~8% of billable weight): ~$832/month additional
Total monthly DIM inefficiency cost: ~$13,104
After 3D optimization (15% shipping cost reduction): Monthly saving of $1,500–$2,600, scaling upward with every further surcharge increase.

The implication is clear: in the current environment, every dollar saved through packaging optimization is effectively worth more than a dollar — because it eliminates not just the base rate overage but also the stack of percentage-based surcharges applied on top of it.

10. Your 6-Step Shipping Resilience Action Plan

The following action plan synthesizes recommendations from CNBC logistics specialists, Nventory.io supply chain analysis, and the specific capabilities of 3DBinPacking.com. It is designed for e-commerce operators who cannot afford to wait for geopolitical resolution before taking action.

Step 1  Run a DIM Weight Audit on Your Last 90 Days

Pull your shipment data and compare billable weight against actual weight for each SKU group. Identify your average DIM weight overage per shipment type. Multiply that overage by your carrier’s rate-per-kg and current fuel surcharge factor. This number is your monthly packaging inefficiency tax. In most implementations, merchants are surprised by the result — and motivated by it.

Step 2  Optimize Your Box Portfolio

Use 3DBinPacking’s ‘Try Out Box Sizes’ algorithm to evaluate your full product catalog against your available container inventory. Identify the SKU groups that are systematically over-boxed. In most e-commerce operations, reducing from 8–12 box sizes to 4–6 optimally-chosen containers (selected algorithmically per order) cuts both material spend and DIM weight charges simultaneously, often by 15–20%.

Step 3  Deploy Real-Time Cartonization at Order Creation

Integrate the 3DBinPacking API with your OMS so that the optimal package selection is calculated the moment an order is placed. This enables accurate landed cost estimation before the customer completes checkout, eliminates post-fulfillment billing surprises, and allows your platform to detect carrier invoice discrepancies automatically.

Step 4  Build 4–6 Week Buffer Stock on Top Sellers

Logistics advisors at Nventory.io recommend building 4–6 weeks of additional safety stock on high-velocity SKUs during the current disruption. This reduces reliance on air freight emergency replenishment — which carries the highest per-kg costs of any shipping mode — and provides pricing stability as ocean freight costs normalize over time.

Step 5  Model Oil Price Scenarios in Your Pricing Structure

The Dallas Fed has modeled WTI oil at $98–$132/barrel depending on closure duration. Build a pricing decision table that maps oil price bands to your per-order shipping cost, and set automated alerts that trigger a pricing review when predetermined thresholds are breached. Proactive margin defense costs far less in customer relationship damage than reactive, surprise price increases.

Step 6  Audit and Challenge Carrier Invoice Accuracy

In periods of high surcharge complexity — when carriers are simultaneously applying BAF, FAF, war risk, emergency freight increases, and insurance adjustments — billing errors increase significantly. 3DBinPacking’s billing audit functionality allows merchants to verify every charge against the actual optimal package selection, flagging overcharges with precision. One implementation detected and recovered billing errors across an entire month of carrier invoices.

11. Scenario Outlook: Oil Prices and E-Commerce Cost Projections

Planning for an uncertain duration requires working with multiple scenarios rather than a single forecast. The following table synthesizes projections from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (March 20, 2026), Goldman Sachs Research, and Mizuho Bank to provide e-commerce operators with a range of cost planning anchors:

Oil price and shipping cost scenarios for e-commerce planning | Sources: Dallas Fed, Goldman Sachs, Mizuho Bank (March 2026)

ScenarioWTI/Brent PriceCarrier Surcharge LevelPlanning Posture
Quick resolution (Strait reopens by end Q2)$85–$98/bblElevated but decliningMaintain buffer stock; begin normalizing pricing
Extended closure (Q3 2026 resolution)$115–$120/bblSustained high; new surcharges possibleMaximize packaging optimization; full DIM audit
Prolonged disruption (Q4 2026+)$130–$132/bblStructurally elevatedEmergency cost reduction; consider nearshoring/reshoring
CONSERVATIVE PLANNING ASSUMPTION FOR E-COMMERCE OPERATIONS
The prudent baseline for supply chain planning is 6 months of significant disruption (through approximately Q3 2026), with only partial mitigation available through alternative routing. In this scenario, per-container costs remain elevated and last-mile surcharges continue to increase. Build your inventory buffers, optimize your packaging, and model your pricing accordingly. Do not wait for resolution before acting.

Goldman Sachs Research notes that even in a scenario where the Strait reopens within one quarter, the downstream effects on shipping infrastructure — port congestion, container repositioning, insurance reset periods — will add further weeks to the normalization of freight rates. The insurance market, in particular, will price in elevated risk premiums for months after the closure ends.

12. Conclusion: Control What You Can

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz is the largest oil supply disruption in the recorded history of global energy markets. It has sent Brent crude above $126 per barrel, added $4,000 to $7,000 in surcharges to every container from Asia, tripled marine insurance premiums, and triggered the largest emergency reserve release in IEA history. Its effects permeate every layer of the e-commerce supply chain.

E-commerce operators cannot control geopolitical strategy, carrier pricing decisions, or oil market dynamics. But they can control, with precision and at scale, the dimensions of every package they ship — and in a high-fuel-cost environment, that control translates directly into recovered margin.

The data is unambiguous: right-sizing packaging and eliminating dimensional weight overages can reduce shipping costs by 15% to 40%, depending on a merchant’s current packaging portfolio. Every percentage point of that saving is worth more in March 2026 than it has ever been before — because surcharges stack multiplicatively on top of every kilogram of wasted dimensional weight.

Tools like 3DBinPacking.com exist precisely for this moment. They require no prior technical knowledge, integrate in days with existing infrastructure, and return optimization results in milliseconds. The merchants who act now — who audit their DIM exposure, optimize their box portfolios, and deploy real-time cartonization — will exit this energy crisis with structural cost advantages over those who waited.

In a crisis defined by variables outside your control, packaging optimization is the lever you can pull today.

Cut Your Shipping Costs by Up to 40% — Starting Today

3DBinPacking’s algorithms select the most cost-efficient container for every order — in real time, at scale, with zero manual effort. No prior technical knowledge required.

→ Try 3DBinPacking Free at 3dbinpacking.com

API documentation available at 3dbinpacking.com/en/api/  |  Plans from Starter to Enterprise

SOURCES & REFERENCES

  1. Wikipedia — 2026 Strait of Hormuz Crisis  [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026_Strait_of_Hormuz_crisis]
  2. Wikipedia — Economic Impact of the 2026 Iran War  [en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_impact_of_the_2026_Iran_war]
  3. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas — What the Closure of the Strait of Hormuz Means for the Global Economy (March 20, 2026)  [dallasfed.org/research/economics/2026/0320]
  4. Goldman Sachs Research — How Will the Iran Conflict Impact Oil Prices? (March 2026)  [goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/how-will-the-iran-conflict-impact-oil-prices]
  5. Euronews — War in Iran: Where in Europe Have Petrol Prices Spiked? (March 19, 2026)  [euronews.com/my-europe/2026/03/19/war-in-iran-where-in-europe-have-petrol-prices-spiked]
  6. Euronews — Passage Denied: Hormuz Shutdown Keeps Oil Prices on an Upward Trajectory (March 4, 2026)  [euronews.com/business/2026/03/04/passage-denied-hormuz-shutdown-keeps-oil-prices-on-an-upward-trajectory]
  7. CNBC — How Strait of Hormuz Closure Can Become Tipping Point for Global Economy (March 11, 2026)  [cnbc.com/2026/03/11/strait-of-hormuz-closure-shipping-economy-oil.html]
  8. Al Jazeera — Shutdown of Hormuz Strait Raises Fears of Soaring Oil Prices (March 3, 2026)  [aljazeera.com/economy/2026/3/3/shutdown-of-hormuz-strait-raises-fears-of-soaring-oil-prices]
  9. Al Jazeera — Iran’s IRGC Says Not One Litre of Oil Will Pass (March 11, 2026)  [aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/11/irans-irgc-says-not-one-litre-of-oil-will-get-through-strait-of-hormuz]
  10. Bruegel — How Will the Iran Conflict Hit European Energy Markets? (March 2, 2026)  [bruegel.org/first-glance/how-will-iran-conflict-hit-european-energy-markets]
  11. UNCTAD — Strait of Hormuz Disruptions: Implications for Global Trade and Development (March 2026)  [unctad.org/publication/strait-hormuz-disruptions-implications-global-trade-and-development]
  12. Speed Commerce — How Much of the World’s Shipping & Oil Goes Through the Strait of Hormuz? (March 2026)  [speedcommerce.com/insights/how-much-of-the-worlds-shipping-goes-through-the-strait-of-hormuz]
  13. Nventory.io — Strait of Hormuz Crisis: E-Commerce Impact 2026 (March 2026)  [nventory.io/us/blog/strait-of-hormuz-ecommerce-impact-2026]
  14. Hellenic Shipping News — Strait of Hormuz Closure: How the World’s Critical Oil Choke Point Shook Global Markets  [hellenicshippingnews.com/strait-of-hormuz-closure-how-the-worlds-most-critical-oil-choke-point-shook-global-markets]
  15. TIME — What Is the Strait of Hormuz and What Impact Could It Have on International Trade? (March 2026)  [time.com/7382242/strait-of-hormuz-closure-threat-iran-war-trade-gas-oil-prices]
  16. 3DBinPacking Blog — Packing Optimization: Save Time & Money  [3dbinpacking.com/en/blog/packing-optimization-software]
  17. 3DBinPacking Blog — Bin Packing Optimization Strategies  [3dbinpacking.com/en/blog/bin-packing-optimization-strategies]
  18. 3DBinPacking Blog — Box Packing Algorithms for Efficient Space Optimization  [3dbinpacking.com/en/blog/box-packing-algorithms-space-optimization]
  19. 3DBinPacking Blog — How to Optimize Packing in E-Commerce  [3dbinpacking.com/en/blog/optimize-packing-ecommerce]
  20. MDPI Applied AI — Using AI for Optimizing Packing Design and Reducing Cost in E-Commerce (July 2025)  [mdpi.com/2673-2688/6/7/146]
  21. PeerJ Computer Science — Optimizing E-Commerce Warehousing Through 3D Bin Packing (October 2023)  [peerj.com/articles/cs-1613]
  22. Anchor Box — E-Commerce Packaging Best Practices 2025 (December 2025)  [anchorbox.com/e-commerce-packaging]

Tom Mulawka

Hi, I'm Tom Mulawka - Chief Operating Officer at 3DBinPacking (Smart Web Minds Ltd.), a 3D load optimization platform used by warehouses, e-commerce brands, manufacturers, and 3PL operators globally.

With over a decade of hands-on experience in logistics operations and transport cost optimization, I focus on areas including cartonization logic, pallet and container loading optimization, dimensional weight (DIM) cost reduction, carrier charge analysis, and ERP/WMS integration of automated packing algorithms.

I write about practical optimization strategies in e-commerce fulfillment, cross-border shipping economics, reverse logistics efficiency, and the financial impact of packing decisions at scale.

Proponowane artykuły